Your Company Is Already Using AI. Just Not Safely.
Dave DuPont, Shane Emmons, and Future Point of View's Scott Klososky on why carriers stall at their third AI agent, and what separates a governance policy from day-to-day oversight.
Dave DuPont, Shane Emmons, and Future Point of View's Scott Klososky on why carriers stall at their third AI agent, and what separates a governance policy from day-to-day oversight.
An AI incident response plan for production LLMs, chatbots, and agents: a six-class incident taxonomy, severity tiers, a phased runbook, and roles.
Six signals your identity, network, endpoint, finance, and code systems already record, how to detect shadow AI with them, and why detection has a ceiling.
What an AI acceptable use policy should contain, how to roll it out, and where the rules actually get enforced. Includes a full 15-section template to adapt.
A field specification for the AI audit trail insurance carriers now need: the model inventory examiners request first, the decision record, retention, bias testing, rate-filing explainability, Lokken discovery, and board reporting.
Reinsurers and rating agencies are already forming a view of the AI in your rating and claims stack. The treaty clauses, rating methodology, case history, and renewal evidence every carrier should understand.
Swept AI CEO Shane Emmons joins a live panel on The Future of Insurance Podcast to discuss agentic AI in claims, AI drift, litigation risk, and the talent pipeline challenge.
A carrier's guide to the NAIC AI bulletin: the AIS Program it requires, where states have adopted it, what the 12-state AI Systems Evaluation Tool pilot asked, the federal preemption fight, and the evidence to keep on file.
Mutual carriers have a structural AI governance advantage: shorter decision chains, policyholder-owners on the board, and no quarterly earnings pressure. Here is how to turn it into a staged, surplus-conscious AI program.
63% of carriers have operationalized AI, yet most cannot prove AI ROI. A practical framework for measuring AI ROI, managing AI spend per user and department, and building a board-ready business case.
Your existing insurance probably doesn't cover AI failures anymore. New CGL endorsements CG 40 47 and CG 40 48 are resolving years of silent AI coverage by excluding generative AI claims from standard policies.
Insurance AI governance across underwriting, claims, catastrophe modeling, distribution, and cyber: where AI runs today, how its failures reach the loss ratio, and the evidence state regulators now expect carriers to produce.
A carrier's guide to AI vendor risk assessment: the questionnaire, how to test vendor claims on your own policies and data, eight contract clauses that survive a market conduct exam, the NAIC vendor registry, and when building beats buying.
Shadow AI is the AI your people use without approval, usually because it beats what they were given. What it is, the risks, what AI data leakage really looks like, and why sanctioning the right tools works where banning fails.
The CRI Financial Services AI Risk Management Framework defines 230 control objectives across four NIST AI RMF functions with a staged adoption model. Built by 108 financial institutions, it is the first industry-consensus AI governance standard for financial services.
The FS AI RMF is the first sector-specific framework to codify GenAI risks within financial regulatory context. Learn how it addresses hallucinations, prompt injection, deepfakes, and agentic AI with specific control objectives.
A practical guide to state AI regulations and state AI laws in 2026: the Colorado AI Act and Colorado's insurance rules, Texas TRAIGA, California SB 53, New York's RAISE Act, Illinois SB 315, privacy law, and how to build one multi-state compliance program.
Even the best models degrade when incoming data shifts from training data. Understanding the types of drift, how to detect them, and how to respond determines whether your models remain reliable over time.
Machine learning models fail silently. Unlike traditional software that crashes visibly, underperforming models continue producing outputs without obvious errors. The right metrics reveal problems before they cause significant harm.
Everything you need to know about EU AI Act compliance: what counts as an AI system, risk classifications, high-risk requirements, timelines, and a practical checklist for enterprise AI teams.
A practical AI governance maturity model: 5 levels, an 8-dimension assessment matrix, a RACI, and a mapping to NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, and the EU AI Act.
A comprehensive guide to AI evaluation — methods, metrics, frameworks, and tools for testing and validating AI systems before and after deployment.
The complete guide to agentic AI governance for carriers: the reliability data, guardrails, runtime supervision, security, and audit trails autonomous AI agents need in production.
Machine learning models can have invisible bugs that traditional testing misses. Explainable AI techniques reveal data leakage, data bias, and other problems that undermine model reliability.
In this episode of The Innovators & Investors Podcast, host Kristian Marquez sits down with Shane Emmons, founder and CEO of Swept, to explore the complexities and challenges surrounding AI trust and reliability
Alex Mysinek sits down with Shane Emmons, Founder and CEO of Swept AI, to talk about the missing piece in the AI revolution—trust. We are creating a system that supervises, evaluates, and protects AI models to ensure safety, accuracy, and alignment.
Swept AI, a startup focused on supervising, interrogating, and optimizing autonomous AI agents, has raised $1.4M in pre-seed funding led by M25, with participation from Wellington Management Company, BuffGold Ventures, SPARK Capital, Service Provider Capital, The Unicorn Group, and angel investors.
This article explores the practical aspects of AI implementation, emphasizing the importance of observability, testing, and realistic expectations. It offers valuable insights for developers seeking to leverage AI effectively in solving real-world problems.
There’s a growing tendency in AI marketing circles to refer to MCP—the Model Context Protocol—as the “USB of AI.” The idea, presumably, is that it offers some kind of plug-and-play universal interface between language models and tools. But this metaphor is worse than lazy—it’s actively misleading.Let’s dig into why this comparison doesn’t work, and why we should be framing MCP for what it really is: the HTTP of agentic AI.